Meanwhile, it was 7% faster than the 6700 XT, and what we've come to expect, miniscule gains. Moving to 1440p further favors the GeForce GPUs and now the 6750 XT is 6% slower than the RTX 3060 Ti and 14% slower than the RTX 3070. Like many Unreal Engine 4 titles this one favors GeForce GPUs and we see this as even the RTX 3060 Ti is faster than the 6750 XT, which was just 7% faster than the original 6700 XT. The Outer Worlds has been added to the day-one review games list as this title balances out what is now the 11 game sample to more closely represent the margins seen between competing AMD and Nvidia products across our massive 50 game tests.
#Aztr750 4peaks option 1080p#
Moving on to Shadow of the Tomb Raider we find that at 1080p the 6750 XT was good for 139 fps, making it 7% faster than the 6700 XT for what basically amounts to RTX 3070 performance.Īt 1440p the 6750 XT pulled out to a 9% margin over the 6700 XT and that allowed it to stick with the RTX 3070 which as we've mentioned before, given current pricing that's a good result for AMD.Īs we move to 4K, the RTX 3070 is able to pull ahead as the 6750 XT trails by a 5% margin and is now on par with the RTX 3060 Ti and just 8% faster than the original 6700 XT.
The 6750 XT was 6% faster than the 6700 XT. As a result the RTX 3070 now matches the 6750 XT. Of course, paying 15% more for the 6750 XT over the 6700 XT is a bit rough given it was just 5% faster.Īs usual, Nvidia's Ampere architecture is much better leveraged at 4K whereas the opposite is true for RNDA2, which becomes bandwidth constrained. That margin was reduced at 1440p, but still the 6750 XT was 13% faster than the RTX 3070, which is an excellent result given how much cheaper this GPU is. A bad result compared to what it's refreshing, but great compared to the RTX 3070 as it was 22% faster. Next we have Watch Dogs: Legion and the 6750 XT is very impressive here relative to the GeForce competition, though rather underwhelming when compared to the 6700 XT as it was just 4% faster. It matched the RTX 3060 Ti again, this time marking it just 5% slower than the RTX 3070. Perhaps most disappointing is that the refresh is just 4% faster than the 6700 XT.Īt 4K the margins change again, the 6750 XT is 8% faster than the 6700 XT which we feel is a best case scenario. The GeForce GPUs fare better at 1440p and here the 6750 XT is only able to match the 3060 Ti, making the RTX 3070 13% faster.
When compared to the RTX 3070 it's just 2% slower, but we estimate it's around 19% cheaper, so a great result for AMD in the current market.Īll of that said, it's just 7% faster than the 6700 XT, so that 15% bump in price is a bit rough, frankly you'd be best off just overclocking the 6700 XT, which is basically all AMD's done. The 6750 XT is expected to settle in at $570, at least based on current pricing, which would place it very close to the 3060 Ti in terms of pricing and in this example it's 8% faster. Based on current Newegg pricing the 6700 XT is down at $490 while the 3060 Ti is at $590. Starting with Rainbow Six Extraction, we see that the 6700 XT and RTX 3060 Ti are evenly matched which is a good result for AMD in the current climate considering the 6700 XT is much cheaper. We will nonetheless look at the 11 game average at all resolutions and the cost per frame analysis.
We tested 11 games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, but because the results are quite repetitive we didn't find the need to go into too much detail, you will agree once you see them. All the data collected is fresh for this review and was gathered in the past week a half using a Ryzen 7 5800X3D system equipped with 32GB of dual-rank, dual-channel DDR4-3200 CL14 memory on the Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Extreme using the latest BIOS supporting the AGESA 1207 microcode. On hand for testing we have the MSI Gaming X Trio and Sapphire Nitro+ models, both excellent boards.įor testing, all AMD and Nvidia GPUs were clocked at their official specifications, with no factory overclocking. We'll analyze just how much of a "deal" the 6750 XT is in our cost per frame segment towards the end of the review. You're also faced with a 15% increase in MSRP which has gone from $480 to $550.
There's also a 9% increase in board power and that's it. not 19%, 19 MHz, but you're getting faster 18 Gbps memory, which results in a 12.5% boost to memory bandwidth when compared to last year's RX 6700. The RX 6750 XT features a core overclock of 19 MHz. This refresh is no different to the Radeon RX 6650 XT we reviewed last week, where after a few tweaks the new model gained about 6% more performance on average over the RX 6600, for an increase in price of 5%. The new Radeon RX 6750 XT is a minor refresh from AMD over the RX 6700 XT GPU released about a year ago.
0 kommentar(er)
